h1

Solution to “Possible HKAL Pure Problems”

四月 1, 2009

1(a) Expanding along the last row, we have:

f(x) = 1  \det{\begin{pmatrix}x &  x^3\\y &  y^3 \end{pmatrix}} - z \det{\begin{pmatrix} 1 & x^3 \\1 & y^3 \end{pmatrix}} + z^3 \det{\begin{pmatrix} 1 &  x \\1 &  y \end{pmatrix}}.

Therefore, f(z) is a cubic in z with leading coefficient \det \begin{pmatrix} 1 & x \\1 & y \end{pmatrix} = y - x.

1(b) Note that f(x) and f(y) have two identical rows, and therefore by properties of determinants, we have f(x) = f(y) = 0. By Factor theorem, we have z - x, z - y are factors of f(z). Since f(z) is a cubic, we must have f(z) = A(z - x)(z - y)(z - r), where r is some root to be determined, and A being the leading coefficient. By part (a), we have A = y - x. Hence f(z) = (y - x)(z - x)(z - y)(z - r) as claimed.

1(c) Since the coefficient of z^2 of f(z) is zero, we have the sum of roots is zero. This implies x + y + r = 0, and therefore we have r = -x - y as claimed.

2) Suppose  g(x) = \log(x) is a polynomial. Then deg(g(x^2)) = 2deg(g(x)), but \log(x^2) = 2\log(x), which implies \deg(\log(x^2)) = deg(\log(x)). Hence we have 2deg(g(x)) = deg(g(x)), which implies deg(g(x)) = 0. i.e. \log(x) is constant, which is absurd. Hence \log(x) is not a polynomial.

One comment

  1. 1)
    eliminate the 1s on the 2nd and 3rd row
    and take out the factors

    2)
    can i use differentiation?



Leave a Comment